- posted 2 years ago
- 5 comments

I've been using jQuery regularly for my new job now for about 3 weeks or so. I've used the selectors, event handling, short cuts/handlers, animations, plugins etc. Nothing too fancy, but in general, a descent exposure. I'd like to compare it with Mootools. And while I do rock a Mootools skin on my phone, I'm going to try and remain as objective as subjectively possible. I'm going to try and stay positive about the differences and give use-cases for using either.
read
- posted 2 years ago
- 3 comments
The Problem
I ran into another problem the other day native to ie6 (well ie7 and ie8 too, to be fair) where by I was trying to dynamically change a text input field from type="text" to type="password". Safari, chrome and firefox had no issues. It was a simple as node.type = 'password', or since I was using mootools, node.set('type','password'). Resolved. But wait...
read

This is definitely up there for me; a very weird discovery about how firefox and safari differ in the way the $_SERVER array is returned.
print_r($_SERVER);
exit();
Run that code in a php script; then check the source in both safari and in firefox. For the path, try something like index.php?name=what'sup
read

I've been told by many people, veterans in their respective industries such as family friends, family members, etc., that when you're in a technical field, the best type of job security is to specialize. I imagine this would extend to a lot of different areas (entertainment, finance, management, etc.) but especially in the technical/programming arena, I find it's very true and productive.
read

There are many browsers out there: IE6, IE7, IE8, FF, Opera, Safari, Chrome.
Then there are tons of mods for each of those. On the mac, a few lesser options (FF, Opera, Safari, soon to be Chrome). I used to scoff at Safari users when it was around the 2.0 release (even 3.0 seemed crap to me). When I adopted the Mac, however, Safari fell into a different light for me. The number one reason it did was because of it's speed.
read